Extraordinary changes require extraordinary evidence

Extraordinary changes demand extraordinary justification backed up by extraordinary evidence

The top three challenges for the NHS are

1. Improve clinical outcomes

2. Abolish health inequalities

3. Save money.

The extraordinary changes proposed in the white paper could only be justified if there was evidence that they would solve these 3 challenges

If it did so there would be an  electoral mandate

But there’s no evidence that it will do that. In fact, what little evidence there is suggests the opposite.

We don’t live in a democracy any more, and yet we passively aquiesce. As Nobel Prize winning physicist Niels Bohr said when asked why he kept a lucky horeshoe over his door, “Of couse I don’t believe in lucky horeshoes, but apparently they work even if you don’t believe in them!”

It’s the same with our relationship with democracy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s